Computing units don't have to be confusing

Overview

Often programmers will use units in a non standard way and usually you can work out what they meant by context.  Many developers never realise there is inconsistencies is technical material as the difference is small to the amount of error and the difficult of reproducing benchmarks reported.

There are times when the difference is so large it does matter and the writer has confused themselves by a lack of understanding which makes your job of trying to work out what they done harder.

An array of measures


  • b = bit.
  • B = byte or 8 bits or 8b
  • g = gram
  • kb = kilobit or 1000 bits. kilo being the scientific prefix for 1000 like kilometer.
  • kB = kilobyte or 1000 bytes, sometimes used for storage
  • kg = kilogram
  • Kb = Kibit = kibibit or 1024 bytes.
  • KB = KiB = kibibyte or 1024 bytes, sometimes used for memory
  • Mb = megabit = 1000^2 bits or 125 kB. Mb/s is used for network bandwidth.
  • MB = megabyte = 1000^2 bytes, MB/s is used for disk bandwidth.
  • MiB = mebibyte = 1024^2 bytes, often referred to as MB or Megabyte for memory.
  • mb = millibits = 0.001 bits - never use correctly.
  • mB = millibytes = 0.008 bits - could be used for compression, but isn't
  • Gb = gigabit = 1000^3 bits or 125 MB, Gb/s is used for network bandwidth.
  • GB = gigabyte = 1000^3 bytes, used for disk space, GB/s is used for memory bandwidth
  • GiB = gibibyte = 1024^3 bytes, often referred to as GB or Gigabyte for memory.
  • gb = gram-bit (also means to feel itchy)
  • gB = gram-byte (someone's Xbox id)
  • TB = Terabyte = 1000^4 bytes, used for disk space.
  • TiB = Tebibyte = 1024^4 bytes, used for memory but usually written as TB.
  • PB = Petabyte = 1000^5 bytes, used for large storage solutions.

Why does it matter?

Where the confusion often arises is when network bandwidth, which is usually in bits/second is confused with disk or memory bandwidth which is usually in bytes/second. To add to the confusion, disk and memory use different prefixes.  

Q: You might see a HDD which can write at 40 MB/s and a network which is 100 Mb/s.  Which is faster? 

A: The HDD is much faster as it can write 320 Mb/s and the network can only write up to 12.5 MB/s (most likely only gets 11 MB/s with overhead)

The use of 'b' and 'B' is a factor of eight difference.

Also confusing is

... memory and disk sizes.  Memory is measured in Gibibytes (1024^3 bytes) as memory has to be a power of 2 in sizes but most people call it GB or gigabytes.  Disk space is measured in gigabytes (1000^3 bytes) as disk space doesn't have to be a power of two, but mostly because it makes the drives appear almost 8% larger.  This is not such a serious problem and it is small enough difference that most people ignore it.

I remember when 4.0 GB drives were replaced by 4.3 GB drives and was amazed to discover they were exactly the same model, but had just been re-labelled.

Memory bandwidth measures are inconsistent and I suspect most of the time it is GB/s which is reported.  (as it is simpler for  human to understand, but more importantly higher) This means if you can read 1 GB (GiB) of memory in one second, the bandwidth is reported as 1.08 GB/s.

Conclusion

Be aware that marketing material and even other developers will mix their units.  You want to have at least a clear idea in your own mind what is really going on. If you can educate them along the way, that would be an improvement.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Java is Very Fast, If You Don’t Create Many Objects

Image
  You still have to watch how many objects you create. This article looks at a benchmark passing events over TCP/IP at 4 billion events per minute using the net.openhft.chronicle.wire.channel package in Chronicle Wire and why we still avoid object allocations..  One of the key optimisations is creating almost no garbage. Allocation is a very cheap operation and collection of very short-lived objects is also very cheap. Does this really make a difference? What difference does one small object per event (44 bytes) make to the performance in a throughput test where GC pauses are amortised? While allocation is as efficient as possible, it doesn’t avoid the memory pressure on the L1/L2 caches of your CPUs and when many cores are busy, they are contending for memory in the shared L3 cache.  Results Benchmark on a Ryzen 5950X with Ubuntu 22.10. JVM Vendor, Version No objects Throughput, Average Latency* One object per event Throughput, Average Latency* Azul Zulu 1.8.0_322 60.6 ...
Read more

System wide unique nanosecond timestamps

A Unique Identifier can be very useful for tracing. Those ids are even more useful when they contain a high-resolution timestamp.  Not only do they record the time of an event, but if unique can help trace events as they pass through the system. Such unique timestamps however can be expensive depending on how they are implemented.   This post explores a lightweight means of producing a unique, monotonically increasing system-wide nano-second resolution timestamp available in our open-source library. Uses for Unique Identifiers Unique identifiers can be useful to associate with a piece of information so that information can be referred to later unambiguously. This could be an event, a request, an order id, or a customer id. They can naturally be used as a primary key in a database or key/value store to retrieve that information later. One of the challenges of generating these identifiers is avoiding creating duplicates while not having an increasing cost.  You could ...
Read more

What does Chronicle Software do?

Image
Overview Chronicle Software is about simplifying fast data.  It is a suite of libraries to make it easier to write, monitor and tune data processing systems where performance and scalability are concerned. But its free, how do you make money, through support? We offer premium support . However, we often hear from users for the first time about a year after they have it in production.  Most users find they can support the software themselves.  It is only after a year or so, they have questions or concerns about where to take the product next.  In many cases, it is to a problem we have already solved and they just need to upgrade their software or use a new module we have added. As we don't know who is using most of our software, we can't advise them on how best to use our software and what updates or enhancements they would benefit from. We need users to contact us and ask questions.  We have a free forum , and we respond to 50% of questions in 2 hours...
Read more